hoka one one

Archive for 2017 年 3 月 6 日

奇葩!女子被强暴因為太舒服不起訴

奇葩!女子被强暴因為太舒服不起訴稱一晚做五次。一女子被强暴後,竟然一再向警察表示不起訴。這究竟是怎麼一回事呢?據該女子交代,自己確實被强暴,但因為自己太舒服,那一晚做了五次,之後還與他經常去開房,直到被家人發現後報案。這事件也實在是有够奇葩的。據悉,該男子因涉嫌強姦罪,已被警方刑拘。
被强奸了,女子竟然不起訴,究竟為什麼呢?因為太爽了。羅某秀曾到晋江永和派出所報案,稱被堂姐夫黃某强奸。永和派出所立案後,將黃某列為網上在逃人員。

1583814941.jpg

經警察深入調查,羅某秀說,4月的一天晚上,黃某確實在永和鎮玉湖村的租住處,强行與她發生了性關係。
女子被强奸之後究竟會怎樣呢?據羅某稱剛開始她是在進行反抗,但堂姐夫並沒有對她那麼粗魯莽,而是用很嫺熟的技巧讓她很舒服,那一晚他們做了五次,後來他還帶她到經常去的飯店開房。直到被家人發現後,家人才到永和派出所報案。

3027216027.jpg

女子被强奸,如果不打算起訴的話,一般只有兩個理由,要不是怕醜事曝光,要不是被被報復。但是,這個女子實在太奇葩了,竟然是因為愛愛過程太爽,所以不起訴。難道,這個强奸犯真的征服了這個女子嗎?

20130218135811_mF3uv.jpeg

從這事可以看出,女人對性愛的需求是多麼的强烈。如果你能滿足她,能够使得她開心,即使是被强奸,她也不會起訴的。當然,並非每一個女人都如此下賤的。

20130218140722_GeruH.jpeg

 

Emma Watson’s Definition of Feminism Should Count for Beyoncé, Too

emma watson topless photoshoot feminism

 

Emma Watson, under fire for appearing in a braless photo for Vanity Fair, pushed back against critics, which reminds us of when she had similar misgivings about Beyoncé. (Photo: Getty Images)

 

When Emma Watson was featured on the cover of the latest issue of Vanity Fair, with an accompanying spread that sees her braless with a cutout top, she got a fair bit of criticism online from all sides. And while the star of Beauty and the Beast had not responded before, she recently did on a press junket interview for the new film. “Is there a controversy about this?” she asked sarcastically.

“It just always reveals to me of how many misconceptions and misunderstandings there [are] about what feminism is,” the 26-year old told the BBC about the reaction to the Tim Walker photograph. “Feminism is about giving women choice. Feminism is not a stick with which to beat other women with. It’s about freedom, it’s about liberation, it’s about equality.”

“I really don’t know what my t*ts have to do with it,” she continued. In the photograph, Watson is wearing a Burberry crochet cape — with no blouse.

“I was slightly taken aback by [that specific shot] because we were doing so many crazy things on that shoot,” the U.N. Women’s goodwill ambassador said. “It had felt so artistic, and I had been so creatively involved and engaged with Tim. I am so thrilled with how interesting and beautiful the photographs were.” But for some, the comments seem hypocritical.

Video Not Available
Unfortunately, this video is not available in your region.
SS-100-202

Feminism should not be used as a measuring stick to criticize and ridicule other women, but it should advocate for a woman’s right to choose how she presents her body, thoughts and emotions. Watson’s track record doesn’t exactly reflect that, as some have pointed out.

In an interview with Wonderland magazine, Watson commented on Beyoncé’s self-titled album. “As I was watching it, I felt very conflicted,” she said. “I felt her message felt very conflicted in the sense that, on the one hand, she is putting herself in a category of a feminist, but then the camera, it felt very male — such a male, voyeuristic experience of her.” But wait, as we all know, it’s Beyoncé who makes the final decision on how she is portrayed, in every sense. So what’s the difference?

That ability to talk out of both sides of your mouth about feminism is what some have derisively deemed “white feminism.” It is categorized as having the sort of viewpoint that, on one hand, defends the speaker (usually a white subject), while at the same time criticizing feminism as it is expressed by others (typically women of color): that is, using feminism as a stick with which to beat other women, essentially.

Here, Watson contends that feminism is about giving women a choice. It was her choice to appear in the way that she did in Walker’s photograph. It was partially her version, apparently, as she was creatively involved in the shoot. But wasn’t Beyoncé, as well? Hasn’t she engineered and directed all aspects of her career and her image, since firing her father back in 2011? Wasn’t she also creatively involved in the final look of her album?

To be fair, Watson may have evolved since her original statements and come to understand that one can be both a feministand appear in lingerie. One can be both sexy to men and adamant about the rights of women. And while it’s her choice whether she reveals this maturation to the public, doing so could go a long way toward letting people understand her seemingly contradictory positions.

高三女孩發現自己竟是男性 是他還是她?

女孩不來例假去檢查,發現自己竟是男性。什麼是雙性人,難道是可男可女,性別可以自由轉換嗎?一高三女生遲遲不來例假去醫院檢查發現自己竟然是男人,這也太讓人震驚了吧,做了差不多20年的女人,突然被告知自己居然是個男人,讓人怎麼接受得了啊。
19歲高三女生,馬上要參加高考了,因遲遲沒來例假最近上醫院檢查,才發現自己竟然是個“兩性人”。
是他?還是她?對於與眾不同之處,他們羞於啟齒,自卑、茫然是他們必經的過程。專家建議,家人應該多關注孩子尤其是青春期時期的變化;對於“兩性人”,還需要社會福斯更多的瞭解和認識。
女孩不來例假去檢查發現自己竟是男性

女孩不来例假去检查 发现自己竟是男性
小李來自衢州,19歲,是一名體育特招生,一直以來都以女孩子的模樣生活著。
14歲時,小李發現自己沒有像周圍的女孩子一樣來例假,家人當時沒有重視,以為等個兩三年就會好,“這個事情”有早有晚嘛。可是一直等到高三,小李還是沒來例假,家人這下急了,去醫院檢查發現小李沒有子宮,患有尿道下裂。
“進一步做性激素和染色體檢查,顯示其睾酮增高,染色體核型分析為46XY,從生物學上說,‘她’就是一名男性!”杭州一家男子醫院院長黃萬順解釋。

靠「捐屎」可以月賺2萬元 還能救人做功德


▲捐大便可以賺2萬元,還能救人。(圖/本報資料照/示意圖)

國際中心/綜合報導

有聽過捐精、捐卵可以賺錢,很少聽過捐「屎」也可以賺錢吧!如今「滿肚子大便」的你機會來了,只要每天捐「屎」,一個月至少可賺4,800元港幣(約台幣近2萬元),重點是捐出來的屎,能夠進行研究,幫助人們對抗腸道疾病,不過目前這捐屎只能在香港。

由香港的亞洲益菌中心(Asia Microbiota Bank)出面招募,主要是為了做腸道益菌的研究,招募志願「捐屎者」,每次捐屎最高可以獲得200元港幣車馬費,一個月若是按照該中心的規劃都來捐,最多可賺4,800元港幣。

當然捐屎不是每個人能捐,目前規定年齡在18至50歲間,不抽菸不喝酒,BMI低於30,且過去3個月沒有服用任何藥物及抗生素,只要通過身體檢查,就能開始「捐屎賺錢」。

▲透過研究大便,可以了解人類的腸道。(圖/翻攝自Asia Microbiota Bank官網)

根據亞洲益菌中心表示,捐屎可以幫助腸道的相關研究,拯救香港受到腸道疾病影響的10萬人。

捐屎消息一出,引發網友熱烈討論,不少人「躍躍欲試」,笑說「果然屎就是黃金」。想到香港捐大便嗎?